Dear readers,
I’ve been called for jury duty starting tomorrow. It could be just for a short period of time, or it could be longer. We’ll see. So, The Secular Jurist blog will be on a temporary hiatus for a while. I’ll do my best to keep in touch.
Happy Blogging! 🙂
I always get called and never get into court. They don’t like my cynicism, and I’ve been lied to so many times, I use faulty reasoning. I know every patient lies. Everyone becomes a patient at some point, therefore everyone lies.
LikeLiked by 2 people
We’re all different, Jim. It’s okay! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Always called, never chosen.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve been told that if you act and sound radical, extremist, self-serving, self-absorbed, and know how to say vague illusive things they won’t choose you. But keep in mind by projecting those characteristics you most likely will get appointed to the White House staff corp. 😬😱
LikeLiked by 5 people
But don’t get caught pretending. That might mean a fine instead of $10 pay
LikeLiked by 2 people
HAH! True. And then after a few months — when the President fires you or you must resign to save a little face — you can publish a book on the never-ending dirty laundry, back-stabbing, everybody-is-against-me traitors, and it’s all the Democrats fault… CIRCUS that is at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, D.C. 😛
LikeLiked by 2 people
What’s even MORE bizarre and puzzling Jim… is that all these people, former White House staff, or at least most all of them, are all appointed by the President. So in truth, this circus is tRumpy created anyway! It’s like Keystone Cops everywhere, only they don’t know anything about the law or governing! LOL
LikeLiked by 1 person
But a lot of them DO know how to get their asses arrested, don’t they!? Hahaha!
LikeLiked by 3 people
On this episode of dumb criminals….
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, faking radicalism to get excused from a jury could be deemed as contempt of court by the judge.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m curious. In Aotearoa New Zealand neither defence nor prosecution can question prospective jurors. When your name is called you walk from the back of the courtroom. If you take a seat in the jury box before you are challenged, you’re on the jury. If challenged, you go home. Neither prosecution nor defence give a reason for the challenge.
I gather it is different in the USA?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Barry, a very insightful question! First, I am not the least bit licensed to practice law in my state nor the nation so I am not the best person to ask. And this might vary from state to state; I’m unsure. However, as I understand it in criminal cases (vs. civil cases) yes, defense and prosecuting teams question possible jurors for selection with the judge presiding. I think the teams do this to ‘weed out’ property taxpaying citizens who might be too biased or leaning toward preconceived notions before the case has even been heard. I am not 100% sure of this, but I think it’s close to that? Maybe? 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Many, many years ago I sat on two different murder trials. (Sidenote: one was found 1st degree, the other 2nd degree.) For both trials, jurors were questioned — mostly about knowledge of the cases and of course, their thoughts on the death penalty. Undoubtedly other questions, but can’t recall what they were. The lawyers can also “excuse without cause” — probably similar to your country.
It’s basically a “weeding out” process, Barry.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I’ve been called for jury service around 8 times, made the walk to the jury box 4 times, challenged twice, and served on two juries (a not guilty, and a mis-trial).
Two murder trials? Wow! What are the statistical odds of that? We average about one murder a week for the whole country, and with a jury roll of over 3 million, the odds of sitting on just one murder trial is very small. Either the odds weren’t with you or you live in a dangerous place.
I think that if the death penalty applied here, and I sat on a murder trial, I think that for me, I’d go from “guilty beyond reasonable doubt” to “guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt”. Mistakes do happen and new technology such as DNA testing has already reversed some convictions here. You can’t undo executions, whereas you can undo a life sentence (typically with millions of dollars in compensation).
LikeLiked by 2 people
You’re so right, Professor – lol!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fun!
LikeLiked by 1 person
So far, so good…
LikeLiked by 1 person
“I’m a strong proponent of jury nullification.” Every time I say this, I never get picked to be on a jury. Funny, that.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It’s true.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good for you. I always like doing jury duty, tho I’m rarely chosen. As per your moniker, this is a high point. Btw, do you, or anyone else you know, ever get called to be on a grand jury?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Bumba. Grand juries typically select members who are notable citizens in some regard – lawyers, civic leaders, etc.; so, I wouldn’t be considered and nobody I’ve ever known has served on one.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I understood differently: that federal grand juries, like local grsnd juries, are picked from federal jurist pools on random basis – which would be the democratic way. Your description seems more likely.Yeah, no wonder I havent been selected. As a social worker I am routinely rejected from most jurist panels. Good luck on yours.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks. Grand juries are supposed to be randomly selected, but typically aren’t because they are investigatory/prosecutorial bodies in contrast to court juries which are decision-making bodies. Outside the U.S., grand juries have been largely replaced by preliminary court hearings.
From: https://www.texastribune.org/2015/08/04/texas-grand-jury-selection-become-more-random/
LikeLike
I put myself on one once, but, since I was self appointed to it, no one recognized my right to be there and I was summarily arrested. BASTARDS!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
There’s no justice in this world – lol!
LikeLiked by 1 person
On a side-note Robert, here is an article I know you’ll be just as interested in as I was angry and infuriated with our long history of 19th-century Wild Wild West Good Ole Boy politics and pseudo-legislative practices in Texas. 😡
https://www.texastribune.org/2019/01/29/texas-voter-citizenship-list-problems-state-tells-counties/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Also, have you caught the PBS docu-series “The Dictator’s Playbook“?
https://www.pbs.org/show/dictators-playbook/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting, I’ll check it out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
How typical. From the article:
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep, exactly. Rig the game and you’re on your way to a 1,000-year Reich, huh?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, underneath all the BS, that does seem to be their agenda.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, and those 5 large counties are GARGANTUAN Robert! (shakes his head) Is this why the Electoral College is probably never going away? Hmmmm.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not anytime soon, that’s for sure.
LikeLiked by 1 person