Home

By Robert A. Vella

In the popular animated sitcom Family Guy, a recurring gag features the character of Cleveland Brown.  He’s sitting in his upstairs bathtub when some improbable catastrophe destroys his home (typically caused by his mentally juvenile neighbor Peter Griffin) sending the naked man and his soap-water filled tub sliding down onto his front lawn while yelling “No, no, no, no, no!”

Poor Cleveland is exclaiming shock-induced denial when confronted with a painful reality he was ill-prepared for.  While other popularized phrases are more expressive, such as “I DON’T believe it!” (actor Michael Forest, Star Trek episode Who Mourns For Adonais?, 1967) and “This CAN’T be happening, man!” (actor Bill Paxton, Aliens, 1986), the shouting of “NO!” basically says it all.  But, exactly what is it that we’re trying to say?

All of us – every man, woman, and child who has ever lived – sees the world from the imagined safety of a perceptual bubble which we subconsciously build for ourselves.  It is a subjective sanctuary permeable to external stimuli which reinforces our preconceptions while being more or less impermeable to that which is contradictory.  We all do this to one degree or another simply as an act of self-preservation because our emotional states can be damaged by certain realities.  The famous movie line “You can’t handle the truth!” (actor Jack Nicholson, A Few Good Men, 1992) reveals this psychological predisposition of ours.

So, our exclamations of “NO!” in this context are intended to warn others that they are pushing us beyond our emotional tolerance and that the actual substance of disagreement isn’t as important.  It is often accompanied by finger-wagging.

Unfortunately, our aversion to and denial of painful realities does not bode well for the continued survival of our species.  We have reached the crisis point where our technological capabilities have greatly surpassed our collective organizational abilities to manage them wisely.  Not only could a brief moment of irrationality bring nuclear devastation down upon us, but our persistent avarice and self-interest are now destroying the very ecosystems necessary to sustain us.  Both time and nature are not on our side.  We may have already outlived our practical longevity.  To prolong humanity’s existence, it will be necessary for us to find a way to overcome ourselves;  and, that means confronting life as it is, not how we wish it to be.

As an exercise, see how many of the following statements triggers this emotional reaction in you.

  1. It is much more likely that Man created God.
  2. Belief in the supernatural results from ignorance of the natural.
  3. The concepts of good and evil are nothing but human abstractions.
  4. Human nature is neither innately positive nor negative, and manifests itself differently from specific circumstances.
  5. Beliefs asserting the inherent superiority or inferiority of particular races, ethnicities, genders, sexual orientations, etc. have discriminatory intent.
  6. The greater the human population, the greater the need for social organization and government.
  7. Secularism and science should have priority over religion and opinion.
  8. Functional democracy is the only political construct which gives the populace a say in government.
  9. What people actually know pales in comparison to what they assume to know.
  10. What Homo sapiens understand about the cosmos pales in comparison to what it does not understand.

24 thoughts on “Why Homo sapiens might not survive: One word says it all

  1. As I read the list, I was going agree, agree down the list (not necessarily an emotional response) until I got to number #9. Unless I’m reading it wrong, I think what people actually know pales in comparison to what they think they know.

    And I basically agree with #3, but do feel another way to state this good and evil thing, rather than being constructs of man is the old premise of what’s good for the many is better or good, than what’s good for the few, which could be evil. I don’t really like using that word, but sometimes it fits. Evil doesn’t have to connate religion, but anything extremely destructive to humanity or the earth. When evil can mean utter destruction, I think it’s more a brute fact than a construct.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Hmmmm… #9 and #10… a pretty smart person had something to say about these:

    “The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance,
    it is the illusion of knowledge.”
    — Stephen Hawking

    Humanity really has no choice but to keep pushing further, even if it means risking lives. The alternatives like clinging to ancient, antiquated paradigms and refusing to embrace the present and possible/probable futures of stagnation… are so, so, SO MUCH WORSE!!! 😳

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply to suburban tracks Cancel reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s