By Robert A. Vella

For those interested in learning more about the postwar Middle East, which has destabilized the entire region along sectarian lines, the latest Frontline documentary Bitter Rivals: Iran and Saudi Arabia is for you.  PBS aired Part One last night, and will air the concluding Part Two next week.

The film is two hours long, but the storyline is quite taut and moves along seamlessly with no unnecessary deviations.  The content is very compelling, and I found myself wanting to watch the second part immediately afterwards.  It is also expertly produced and directed, accurate and unbiased in its portrayal of the events of that period.  The story is so focused on sectarianism, however, that some important components of Middle East history over the last half century were omitted such as the role of Egypt and the 1978 Camp David Accords.

The documentary begins with the 1953 Iranian coup, orchestrated by the British and American intelligence community, which overthrew the democratically elected prime minister (Mohammad Mosaddegh) to return power back to the Shah of Iran (Mohammad Reza Pahlavi) who was amenable to western oil interests.  This pivotal event instilled great anti-American sentiment in Iran and eventually triggered the 1979 Iranian revolution which – for the first time in modern history – prompted Shi’a (Shiite) Muslims to expand their spiritually centric religious practices into the political arena.  This, in turn, led to a profound ongoing schism between Iran and Sunni Muslim Saudi Arabia which underlies the region’s worsening instability today.  The beginning of the documentary also includes a fine historical review of the differences between Shi’a and Sunni Muslims.

Another pivotal event in this story is the 1979 Grand Mosque seizure where Sunni Muslim extremists, angered over the westernization (i.e. social liberalization) of Saudi Arabia, occupied the Masjid al-Haram in Mecca and called for the overthrow of the House of Saud.  Although the extremists were put down, the Saudi royal family conceded many of their demands which appeased the nation’s orthodox Wahhabi clerics.

The Middle East situation gets worse from there.  With opposing Islamic fundamentalists controlling Iran and exerting great influence in Saudi Arabia, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan spurs the rise of militant Sunni extremist organizations such as al-Qaeda (funded indirectly by Saudi Arabia and the U.S.).  The deadly sectarian Iran-Iraq War occurs, allying the West with Saudi Arabia and Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein against Iran.  Saddam’s subsequent invasion of Kuwait causes great consternation with his allies, and the Bush administration’s miscalculation (i.e. the Iraq War) after the 9/11 terrorist attacks (by al-Qaeda) seals his fate.  With Saddam out of the way, Iran’s influence with the Shi’a population in Iraq intensifies as does the human carnage of sectarian conflict in that country and beyond.

The Israeli invasion of southern Lebanon and the rise of Iranian-backed Hezbollah are also examined, which I suspect will be covered with greater detail in Part Two – the advent of the Islamic State (a.k.a. ISIS, ISIL) and the Syrian Civil War.

26 thoughts on “Review of Frontline documentary “Bitter Rivals: Iran and Saudi Arabia” (Part One)

  1. I too watch this outstanding documentary last night and yes, it is extremely well done, well researched and portrayed and get’s into sufficient history of the Middle East and Islamic sectarianism — although the deeper broader history of the region in this documentary was just as heavily dictated by the victorious Western Alliances after WWI and certainly WWII with Zionist Israel and the USA’s support for the invasion/occupation by Zionist Israel in Palestine. But I suspect that just that broad history would require at LEAST two more parts. LOL

    The two impressions that I came away with watching last night’s Part One was 1) how incredibly similar the deep volatile Islamic sectarianism mirrors all those in Christianity’s history as well, identical in many ways, and 2) how much the U.S. has naively contributed to the Middle East’s instability by always protecting its OWN interests no matter what the prevailing wiser actions would warrant, e.g. invading Iraq — a nation we were NEVER going to completely stabilize in the mid- or long-term! Why? The very reasons the documentary covered: W. Bush, his administration, and Congress were CLUELESS about the why’s and how’s of the deep chasm between Shiite and Sunni Islam (i.e. Saudi Arabia vs. Iran) and our long-standing (ignorant!) alliance with Zionist Israel.

    The USA’s and the West’s non-stop naive interference in the region has NOT stabilized it anymore than what our neutral absence would’ve accomplished! And should I mention the USA’s NON-RESPONSE or apathy when Saddam Hussein (a former ally of the U.S.) was repeatedly using chemical weapons during the Iran/Iraq War!? Why did we just turn our heads then!?

    I too am very much looking forward to the next installment Robert! 🙂

    Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s