By Robert A. Vella

In this disturbingly messed-up world we’re living in today, it is easy and natural for us to pick sides in disputes between powerful entities and players.  We do this because we’re desperate to look for good guys who will confront the myriad and growing forces of evil which surround us.  But, let me uncomfortably enlighten you.  There are no “good guys,” nor agents of evil, in positions of power or anywhere else, only various kinds of actors performing various roles which all serve predetermined and often competing agendas.

No one speaks about this better than the widely-despised journalist Glenn Greenwald.  In the following Democracy Now! articles, Greenwald explains America’s powerful intelligence community (the “Deep State” in his words, and the “Shadow Government” in mine), its bitter feud with irreverent President Trump over his relationship with Russia, and why the Democratic Party is being hypocritical on the leaking of confidential government information.

From Greenwald: Empowering the “Deep State” to Undermine Trump is Prescription for Destroying Democracy:

GLENN GREENWALD: The deep state, although there’s no precise or scientific definition, generally refers to the agencies in Washington that are permanent power factions. They stay and exercise power even as presidents who are elected come and go. They typically exercise their power in secret, in the dark, and so they’re barely subject to democratic accountability, if they’re subject to it at all. It’s agencies like the CIA, the NSA and the other intelligence agencies, that are essentially designed to disseminate disinformation and deceit and propaganda, and have a long history of doing not only that, but also have a long history of the world’s worst war crimes, atrocities and death squads. This is who not just people like Bill Kristol, but lots of Democrats are placing their faith in, are trying to empower, are cheering for as they exert power separate and apart from—in fact, in opposition to—the political officials to whom they’re supposed to be subordinate.

And you go—this is not just about Russia. You go all the way back to the campaign, and what you saw was that leading members of the intelligence community, including Mike Morell, who was the acting CIA chief under President Obama, and Michael Hayden, who ran both the CIA and the NSA under George W. Bush, were very outspoken supporters of Hillary Clinton. In fact, Michael Morell went to The New York Times, and Michael Hayden went to The Washington Post, during the campaign to praise Hillary Clinton and to say that Donald Trump had become a recruit of Russia. The CIA and the intelligence community were vehemently in support of Clinton and vehemently opposed to Trump, from the beginning. And the reason was, was because they liked Hillary Clinton’s policies better than they liked Donald Trump’s. One of the main priorities of the CIA for the last five years has been a proxy war in Syria, designed to achieve regime change with the Assad regime. Hillary Clinton was not only for that, she was critical of Obama for not allowing it to go further, and wanted to impose a no-fly zone in Syria and confront the Russians. Donald Trump took exactly the opposite view. He said we shouldn’t care who rules Syria; we should allow the Russians, and even help the Russians, kill ISIS and al-Qaeda and other people in Syria. So, Trump’s agenda that he ran on was completely antithetical to what the CIA wanted. Clinton’s was exactly what the CIA wanted, and so they were behind her. And so, they’ve been trying to undermine Trump for many months throughout the election. And now that he won, they are not just undermining him with leaks, but actively subverting him. There’s claims that they’re withholding information from him, on the grounds that they don’t think he should have it and can be trusted with it. They are empowering themselves to enact policy.

Now, I happen to think that the Trump presidency is extremely dangerous. You just listed off in your news—in your newscast that led the show, many reasons. They want to dismantle the environment. They want to eliminate the safety net. They want to empower billionaires. They want to enact bigoted policies against Muslims and immigrants and so many others. And it is important to resist them. And there are lots of really great ways to resist them, such as getting courts to restrain them, citizen activism and, most important of all, having the Democratic Party engage in self-critique to ask itself how it can be a more effective political force in the United States after it has collapsed on all levels. That isn’t what this resistance is now doing. What they’re doing instead is trying to take maybe the only faction worse than Donald Trump, which is the deep state, the CIA, with its histories of atrocities, and say they ought to almost engage in like a soft coup, where they take the elected president and prevent him from enacting his policies. And I think it is extremely dangerous to do that. Even if you’re somebody who believes that both the CIA and the deep state, on the one hand, and the Trump presidency, on the other, are extremely dangerous, as I do, there’s a huge difference between the two, which is that Trump was democratically elected and is subject to democratic controls, as these courts just demonstrated and as the media is showing, as citizens are proving. But on the other hand, the CIA was elected by nobody. They’re barely subject to democratic controls at all. And so, to urge that the CIA and the intelligence community empower itself to undermine the elected branches of government is insanity. That is a prescription for destroying democracy overnight in the name of saving it.

From Greenwald: Democrats Seem to Consider Snowden’s & Manning’s Leaks Evil & Leaks Under Trump Heroic:

Over four years ago, NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden warned that he or other NSA analysts could spy on anyone, even the U.S. president. “I, sitting at my desk, certainly had the authorities to wiretap anyone, from you or your accountant to a federal judge, to even the president, if I had a personal email,” Snowden said in an interview with Glenn Greenwald in Hong Kong. We talk to Greenwald about the difference between how Washington reacted to Snowden’s leaks and today’s leaks about Gen. Michael Flynn.

9 thoughts on “Glenn Greenwald discusses the “Deep State,” its feud with Trump, and Democrats’ hypocrisy on leaks

  1. I have not followed the links but the bit you have put up gives a very bleak situation; it is tRump and hope he is checked by the courts and Congress or CIA and they are checked by no one.
    It was a mistake to develop the means to spy on people’s privacy. People were told it is for their safety; they will lose both safety and liberty

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Our Western democracies are certainly being subverted by powerful forces, and we have no chance to defend them without level headed appraisal of what is going on – not helped by mainstream media which ignores pertinent issues, and ramps up hysteria at every opportunity.
    What bothers me about recent politics is the electorate is only ever presented with the options that the ruling elite want – we can vote, but we can’t vote for what we want.
    As a Brit I am wary of expressing any opinion about American politics. But it seemed to me that the populace was not happy with the choice of either Clinton or Trump. Trying to work out which was the least worst option – what could the voters do? My guess is those who voted against Clinton did so because they knew it was just going to be more of the same, so they gambled on the alternative.
    Being forced to make hazardous choices, seems to be a speciality of our ruling elite. Good choices are carefully kept off the menu.
    My view is our ruling elites are all con artists. That bit is easy. Working out what to do about it – that’s the hard bit.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Pingback: Wisdom[?] Inc.

Comments are closed.