Home

The Washington State Office of  the Attorney General sent out this news release today:

* * * * *

Grocery Manufacturers Association challenges constitutionality of state’s campaign finance laws
Countersuit by out-of-state organization threatens transparency in Washington elections

OLYMPIAAttorney General Bob Ferguson announced today that he would vigorously defend the constitutionality of Washington’s campaign finance disclosure laws— and the enforcement of these laws— against a challenge filed by the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA).

On Jan. 3 in Thurston County Superior Court, the GMA answered the Attorney General’s campaign disclosure lawsuit against the GMA with a counterclaim. The organization also filed a separate civil rights complaint against Ferguson. The GMA claims Ferguson is unconstitutionally enforcing Washington’s laws and challenges the constitutionality of requiring the GMA to register a political committee before requesting and receiving contributions to oppose Initiative 522.

“After breaking our state’s campaign finance disclosure laws, the GMA now seeks to have them declared unconstitutional,” Ferguson said. “I look forward to defending transparency in Washington elections.”

Ferguson filed a lawsuit against the GMA in October 2013. The state alleges the GMA violated Washington’s campaign finance disclosure laws when it solicited and collected roughly $10.6 million from its members, placed those funds in a special “Defense of Brand” account and used them to oppose Initiative 522.

I-522 was a measure rejected by Washington voters in November. It would have required mandatory labeling of genetically engineered foods, seeds and seed products in this state.

In memos obtained by the Attorney General’s Office, the GMA described efforts to develop “a funding mechanism to address the GMO (genetically modified organisms) issue” while “better shielding companies from attack for providing funding.”

The $10.6 million originally concealed by the GMA makes this the largest campaign finance disclosure case in state history.

Under Washington law, the state alleges the GMA should have first formed a political committee, registered it in Washington and followed Washington campaign finance disclosure requirements before contributing the money to the No on 522 campaign.

In its counterclaim and civil rights suit, the GMA claims the following are unconstitutional as they have been applied in this case:

  • Washington’s law requiring the GMA to file a political committee before collecting funds from its members for specific political activity in Washington;
  • Washington’s law requiring the GMA to disclose the organizations who contributed to its special political fund and how much they donated; and
  • Washington’s law requiring the GMA to secure $10 in donations from 10 separate registered Washington voters as part of its political committee before donating to another political committee.

The GMA also claims the requirement to secure $10 from 10 registered Washington voters before making political committee to political committee transfers is unconstitutional in all settings.

The GMA is a trade association, based in Washington DC, representing more than 300 food, beverage and consumer product companies. It was the largest single donor to the No on 522 campaign.

Additional background on the case

One thought on “Industry group opposed to GMO labeling challenges constitutionality of WA campaign finance laws

  1. Pingback: Industry group opposed to GMO labeling challenges constitutionality of WA campaign finance laws | Facing The Absurd

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s